Kristol,
Stating the bleeding obvious does not a column make, but I guess it is too much to be hoped for your column to offer anything 'new'.
Yes, 'a new' paradigm is needed. Yes, Obama must think 'anew'. Yes, those who wish to help must think 'anew' too. Too bad it seems so hard for you. More substance if you will... please.
Showing posts with label Kristol. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kristol. Show all posts
Monday, November 24, 2008
Monday, November 10, 2008
Kristol & the GOP: Barking up the wrong tree... again
Kristol,
Your column is going to the dogs.
With nary a mention of the real issues facing the GOP, you again cling to the spurious notion that the US is "still a center right country" by saying the election results weren't really as bad as they could have been? Your tea-leaf reading of the voters reported ideological self-identification is not just weak - its absurd. A loss is a loss, and the GOP's demonstrable failure to broaden its base beyond its mostly white, mostly reactionary, old style republicanism is the real issue. Too bad the best advice you could offer your like-minded brethren was that "it wouldn’t hurt" for the "possible 2012 G.O.P. nominees to begin bringing some puppies home for their kids" to broaden their electoral popular appeal? Absurd.
There is only one thing left to say re: your banal analysis.
WOOF!
Your column is going to the dogs.
With nary a mention of the real issues facing the GOP, you again cling to the spurious notion that the US is "still a center right country" by saying the election results weren't really as bad as they could have been? Your tea-leaf reading of the voters reported ideological self-identification is not just weak - its absurd. A loss is a loss, and the GOP's demonstrable failure to broaden its base beyond its mostly white, mostly reactionary, old style republicanism is the real issue. Too bad the best advice you could offer your like-minded brethren was that "it wouldn’t hurt" for the "possible 2012 G.O.P. nominees to begin bringing some puppies home for their kids" to broaden their electoral popular appeal? Absurd.
There is only one thing left to say re: your banal analysis.
WOOF!
Monday, October 27, 2008
Not all Hero's are Republicans
Kristol,
Palin's assertion (and your concurrence) that only John McCain “has truly fought for America” is telling. It highlights the fundamental flaws of neo-cons like yourself who believe mistakenly that all American 'wars' are foreign and not domestic. Blind to the needs of homeland's citizenry you confuse military service, albeit noble, with patriotism.
Indeed, they are many fronts in the battle for the preservation of the nation today and some choose to fight on the fields at home, in the inner cities, and yes as community organizers. Their commitment to the war on inequality and poverty at home, to the war against upper class entitlements are no less important. Heroes come in all shapes and colours and, despite your assertions to the contrary, John McCain is far from the only 'hero' this season who is standing before the American people and pledging to fight for them.
Palin's assertion (and your concurrence) that only John McCain “has truly fought for America” is telling. It highlights the fundamental flaws of neo-cons like yourself who believe mistakenly that all American 'wars' are foreign and not domestic. Blind to the needs of homeland's citizenry you confuse military service, albeit noble, with patriotism.
Indeed, they are many fronts in the battle for the preservation of the nation today and some choose to fight on the fields at home, in the inner cities, and yes as community organizers. Their commitment to the war on inequality and poverty at home, to the war against upper class entitlements are no less important. Heroes come in all shapes and colours and, despite your assertions to the contrary, John McCain is far from the only 'hero' this season who is standing before the American people and pledging to fight for them.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Kristol's Vulgus - a Crack in need of a viel.
October 20th, 2008 1:30 am
Kristol, so your joining Joe the Plumber in his crusade? Good luck. The only problem is you share little with this unaccredited plumber beyond your hatred for Obama. However, like plumbers the world over, you too have a stereotypical crack that requires covering up - unfortunately though your duplicitous crack has teeth and has a place of prominence on your visage - vulgus indeed!
Kristol, so your joining Joe the Plumber in his crusade? Good luck. The only problem is you share little with this unaccredited plumber beyond your hatred for Obama. However, like plumbers the world over, you too have a stereotypical crack that requires covering up - unfortunately though your duplicitous crack has teeth and has a place of prominence on your visage - vulgus indeed!
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Kristol's "The Wright Stuff" - I pity the petty.
fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/opinion/06kristol.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin
Mr. Kristol,
Orchestration of orchestration! Wow, Ayers, Wright, and an unspecified open ended allegations that Obama is not being "wholly truthful" - all in one column! Sir, like your twisted-twin amigos, Krautcrazy and Gerson over at the WaPo, you are nothing more than a discourse distortionist.
With this column your standing as a shameless 'agent provacateur' for the McCain/Palin ticket is confirmed. Obviously they needed a messenger to formally announce the launch of their renewed "culture war" strategy. Well at least they didn't have to look too hard to find you under that rock of hyper-partisanship and divisiveness you call an ideology. The perfect lapdog, one can well imagine your delight at being picked as the messenger in this sad attempt by McCain/Palin to buttress their sagging electoral fortunes.
As to the relighting the Wright issue, nary a finer passage of a disingenuous 'interview' has ever been written. First you bring the issue up. Then she expounds. But then, she invokes a perverse form of reverse logic by saying, wholly unconvincingly, that it will really be up to McCain if it is to become an official part of the GOP strategy (or is that tactic?). Of course, by having expounded on it - she has, knowingly, just made the "appalling things that that pastor had said about our great country" again a focal point of their strategy!
As to your offer to 'volunteer' to 'moderate' a second Biden-Palin, the premise is unsound (and laughable) you wouldn't know how to "moderate" if the terms denotative definition slapped you upside your toxic cranium. You are about as equipped to serve as a debate moderator as Palin is to serve as the Vice-President.
By the way, of course, Gov, Palin seemed "confident and upbeat" despite the "strain and stress" a normal person would be feeling under the circumstances. Easy explanation there: People without a clue are often are completely ignorant of their lived context prior to their downfall. "Let them eat cake" anyone?
Mr. Kristol, I trust you are delighted by the new dark turn the McCain campaign is taking - and this fact, rather than making me angry, simply makes me pity the petty even more.
Mr. Kristol,
Orchestration of orchestration! Wow, Ayers, Wright, and an unspecified open ended allegations that Obama is not being "wholly truthful" - all in one column! Sir, like your twisted-twin amigos, Krautcrazy and Gerson over at the WaPo, you are nothing more than a discourse distortionist.
With this column your standing as a shameless 'agent provacateur' for the McCain/Palin ticket is confirmed. Obviously they needed a messenger to formally announce the launch of their renewed "culture war" strategy. Well at least they didn't have to look too hard to find you under that rock of hyper-partisanship and divisiveness you call an ideology. The perfect lapdog, one can well imagine your delight at being picked as the messenger in this sad attempt by McCain/Palin to buttress their sagging electoral fortunes.
As to the relighting the Wright issue, nary a finer passage of a disingenuous 'interview' has ever been written. First you bring the issue up. Then she expounds. But then, she invokes a perverse form of reverse logic by saying, wholly unconvincingly, that it will really be up to McCain if it is to become an official part of the GOP strategy (or is that tactic?). Of course, by having expounded on it - she has, knowingly, just made the "appalling things that that pastor had said about our great country" again a focal point of their strategy!
As to your offer to 'volunteer' to 'moderate' a second Biden-Palin, the premise is unsound (and laughable) you wouldn't know how to "moderate" if the terms denotative definition slapped you upside your toxic cranium. You are about as equipped to serve as a debate moderator as Palin is to serve as the Vice-President.
By the way, of course, Gov, Palin seemed "confident and upbeat" despite the "strain and stress" a normal person would be feeling under the circumstances. Easy explanation there: People without a clue are often are completely ignorant of their lived context prior to their downfall. "Let them eat cake" anyone?
Mr. Kristol, I trust you are delighted by the new dark turn the McCain campaign is taking - and this fact, rather than making me angry, simply makes me pity the petty even more.
Monday, September 29, 2008
American Thinker- wrong on Kristol
fr: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/kristol_how_mccain_wins.html
Mr. Moran,
There is simply no other way to put this. What you are proffering here is nothing more than a fine example of the excretion of egregious partisanship.
Cripes, I'm not sure who is more misguided, you, Kristol or Chuck Krautcrazy over at the Washington Post. Either way, one thing's for sure - a mind taxed by desperation is a terrible thing to lose; and it is clear that Mr. Kristol's is irrevocably lost.
Regarding Kritsol's trite offering today, nary a finer textual example of psycho-social disconnect and denial has ever been penned. To be blunt sir, I believe he no longer possess of the skill set required to grasp reality - let alone its truths.
Instead of blaming McCain's advisers for counseling "ideological timidity", Kristol should have said what he really meant: he wants John McCain to re-ignite the culture wars. He wants the election to devolve into a divisive battle rife with false moral assumptions about the 'other'. In his world, this 'other' is 'liberalism' and by raising Rev. Wright again, he is seeking to reanimate a 'bogeyman', a distraction, that will provide people of your ilk with an opportunity to twist the legitimate foundations of liberalism into a empty vessel. A vessel into which you will pour all the evils of the world. What you are really counseling by backing Kristol is that McCain/Palin to do is follow Hitler's advice "To make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they [the voters] will believe it.” My God, what price free speech.
As for Kristol's assertion that Gov. Palin is "a talented politician and communicator" - there is no evidence yet that the woman can think on her feet. While it's clear she can read a teleprompter, this is hardly a substitute for the cogent critical thought necessary to run a country. Let alone a great country. The fact she has yet to demonstrate any ability to handle unscripted complex questions seems not to influence his assessment. Moreover, his ridiculous contention that she must be 'liberated' demeans both her and the voter. This is not a 'Free Willy' movie. Had either she (or GOP strategists) really believed she was an asset to the message she would have been unleashed upon the medium long ago. That has not is telling. Ironically, Mr. Moran, you and I see eye to eye on the fallacy Kristol tries to advance on this point- except, of course, that you see this as an opportunity for Gov. Palin to capitalize on her simple-minded brashness, whereas I will be looking for substance.
In conclusion, what Mr. Kristol offered today was a form of pundit-dung indicative of the worst kind of partisanship that is blinded by a reactionary ideology intent on fostering nothing less than the telling of lies. Yet, perhaps, here again Kristol is channeling Hitler, and unfortunately you also seem to concur with the observation: “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.” The endorsement of an 'ends justifying the means' mantra is a sad reflection of the accepted values in a civil society. But again, such is the price of free speech.
Both you and Kristol need to look in the mirror and realize your true enemy is not liberalism - it is your fear and hate of the 'other'. Ask yourself, honestly, are you a truth teller? Beware the answer sir, for as Kristol may already know, as may you - the rationalization and answers of one who has lost one's mind cannot be trusted.
p.s. fully aware there is every likelihood you will refrain from posting this. I nevertheless respect your right to free speech.
Posted by: BeerBellyBuddah | September 29, 2008 12:14 PM
Mr. Moran,
There is simply no other way to put this. What you are proffering here is nothing more than a fine example of the excretion of egregious partisanship.
Cripes, I'm not sure who is more misguided, you, Kristol or Chuck Krautcrazy over at the Washington Post. Either way, one thing's for sure - a mind taxed by desperation is a terrible thing to lose; and it is clear that Mr. Kristol's is irrevocably lost.
Regarding Kritsol's trite offering today, nary a finer textual example of psycho-social disconnect and denial has ever been penned. To be blunt sir, I believe he no longer possess of the skill set required to grasp reality - let alone its truths.
Instead of blaming McCain's advisers for counseling "ideological timidity", Kristol should have said what he really meant: he wants John McCain to re-ignite the culture wars. He wants the election to devolve into a divisive battle rife with false moral assumptions about the 'other'. In his world, this 'other' is 'liberalism' and by raising Rev. Wright again, he is seeking to reanimate a 'bogeyman', a distraction, that will provide people of your ilk with an opportunity to twist the legitimate foundations of liberalism into a empty vessel. A vessel into which you will pour all the evils of the world. What you are really counseling by backing Kristol is that McCain/Palin to do is follow Hitler's advice "To make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they [the voters] will believe it.” My God, what price free speech.
As for Kristol's assertion that Gov. Palin is "a talented politician and communicator" - there is no evidence yet that the woman can think on her feet. While it's clear she can read a teleprompter, this is hardly a substitute for the cogent critical thought necessary to run a country. Let alone a great country. The fact she has yet to demonstrate any ability to handle unscripted complex questions seems not to influence his assessment. Moreover, his ridiculous contention that she must be 'liberated' demeans both her and the voter. This is not a 'Free Willy' movie. Had either she (or GOP strategists) really believed she was an asset to the message she would have been unleashed upon the medium long ago. That has not is telling. Ironically, Mr. Moran, you and I see eye to eye on the fallacy Kristol tries to advance on this point- except, of course, that you see this as an opportunity for Gov. Palin to capitalize on her simple-minded brashness, whereas I will be looking for substance.
In conclusion, what Mr. Kristol offered today was a form of pundit-dung indicative of the worst kind of partisanship that is blinded by a reactionary ideology intent on fostering nothing less than the telling of lies. Yet, perhaps, here again Kristol is channeling Hitler, and unfortunately you also seem to concur with the observation: “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.” The endorsement of an 'ends justifying the means' mantra is a sad reflection of the accepted values in a civil society. But again, such is the price of free speech.
Both you and Kristol need to look in the mirror and realize your true enemy is not liberalism - it is your fear and hate of the 'other'. Ask yourself, honestly, are you a truth teller? Beware the answer sir, for as Kristol may already know, as may you - the rationalization and answers of one who has lost one's mind cannot be trusted.
p.s. fully aware there is every likelihood you will refrain from posting this. I nevertheless respect your right to free speech.
Posted by: BeerBellyBuddah | September 29, 2008 12:14 PM
Bill Kristol- Losing his mind defending McCain
fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html#postComment
September 29th, 2008 2:55 am
Mr. Kristol,
Cripes, I'm not sure who is more misguided, you or Krautcrazy over at the Washington Post. Either way, one thing's for sure - a mind taxed by desperation is a terrible thing to lose; and it is clear yours is irrevocably lost.
Regarding your trite offering today, nary a finer textual example of psycho-social disconnect and denial has ever been written. To be blunt sir, I believe you are no longer possess of the skill set required to grasp reality - let alone its truths.
Your blaming of Sen. McCain's advisers for counseling "ideological timidity" is both laughable and disingenuous. You should have said what you really meant: you want John McCain to re-ignite the culture wars. You want the election to devolve into a divisive battle rife with false moral assumptions about the 'other'. In your world, this 'other' is 'liberalism' and byy raising Rev. Wright again, you are seeking to reanimate a 'bogeyman', a distraction, that will provide people of your ilk with an opportunity to twist the legitimate foundations of liberalism into a empty vessel. A vessel which both you and McCain can pour all the evils of the world. What you are really counseling McCain/Palin to do is follow Hitler's advice "To make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they [the voters] will believe it.” In your sad defense, perhaps this is only way the GOP ticket can win? But, my God, what a cost.
As for your assertion that Gov. Palin is "a talented politician and communicator" - there is no evidence yet that the woman can think on her feet. While it's clear she can read a teleprompter, this is hardly a substitute for the cogent critical thought necessary to run a country. Let alone a great country. The fact she has yet to demonstrate any ability to handle unscripted complex questions seems not to influence your characterization. Moreover, your ridiculous contention that she must be 'liberated' demeans both her and the voter. This is not a 'Free Willy' movie. Had either she (or GOP strategists) really believed she was an asset to the message she would have been unleashed upon the medium long ago. The fact she has not is telling.
In conclusion, Mr. Kristol, your pundit-dung is the indicative of the worst kind of partisanship - blinded by a reactionary ideology you are intent on fostering nothing less than the telling of lies. Yet, perhaps, here again you are channeling Hitler, for undoubtedly you seem to concur with his observation: “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”
Look in the mirror Mr. Kristol, your true enemy is not liberalism - it is your cultural hate. Ask yourself, honestly, are you a truth teller? Beware the answer sir, for as you may already know - one who has lost one's mind cannot be trusted.
— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada
September 29th, 2008 2:55 am
Mr. Kristol,
Cripes, I'm not sure who is more misguided, you or Krautcrazy over at the Washington Post. Either way, one thing's for sure - a mind taxed by desperation is a terrible thing to lose; and it is clear yours is irrevocably lost.
Regarding your trite offering today, nary a finer textual example of psycho-social disconnect and denial has ever been written. To be blunt sir, I believe you are no longer possess of the skill set required to grasp reality - let alone its truths.
Your blaming of Sen. McCain's advisers for counseling "ideological timidity" is both laughable and disingenuous. You should have said what you really meant: you want John McCain to re-ignite the culture wars. You want the election to devolve into a divisive battle rife with false moral assumptions about the 'other'. In your world, this 'other' is 'liberalism' and byy raising Rev. Wright again, you are seeking to reanimate a 'bogeyman', a distraction, that will provide people of your ilk with an opportunity to twist the legitimate foundations of liberalism into a empty vessel. A vessel which both you and McCain can pour all the evils of the world. What you are really counseling McCain/Palin to do is follow Hitler's advice "To make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they [the voters] will believe it.” In your sad defense, perhaps this is only way the GOP ticket can win? But, my God, what a cost.
As for your assertion that Gov. Palin is "a talented politician and communicator" - there is no evidence yet that the woman can think on her feet. While it's clear she can read a teleprompter, this is hardly a substitute for the cogent critical thought necessary to run a country. Let alone a great country. The fact she has yet to demonstrate any ability to handle unscripted complex questions seems not to influence your characterization. Moreover, your ridiculous contention that she must be 'liberated' demeans both her and the voter. This is not a 'Free Willy' movie. Had either she (or GOP strategists) really believed she was an asset to the message she would have been unleashed upon the medium long ago. The fact she has not is telling.
In conclusion, Mr. Kristol, your pundit-dung is the indicative of the worst kind of partisanship - blinded by a reactionary ideology you are intent on fostering nothing less than the telling of lies. Yet, perhaps, here again you are channeling Hitler, for undoubtedly you seem to concur with his observation: “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”
Look in the mirror Mr. Kristol, your true enemy is not liberalism - it is your cultural hate. Ask yourself, honestly, are you a truth teller? Beware the answer sir, for as you may already know - one who has lost one's mind cannot be trusted.
— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
NYT version of Will critique
from: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/24/opinion/24wed1.html?s=2&pg=3
September 24th, 2008 10:48 am
"Experience demands that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the general prey of the rich on the poor." - Thomas Jefferson
Today in the Washington Post George Will observed "The essence of this crisis is lack of knowledge, including the inability to know who owes what to whom, and where risk resides." Of course this is the same pundit who once observed: "The future has a way of arriving unannounced." Well, the future is here. The American economy is in tatters. Congressional oversight, always a dream, is soon to be a nightmare. And the 'free market' is but a corrupt joke.
The brand of political and economic freedom prized so dearly by the likes of G. Will and W. Kristol has failed. Its potential sold short. Sold on the cheap. Sold on the backs of the American public.
George Will once opined: "Americans are overreaching; overreaching is the most admirable and most American of the many American excesses." Now with capitalist excess rotting the foundation of the once "shining house on a hill" its time he recanted.
The incestuous relationship long championed by the right wing mouth pieces turns out to have been built on nothing but a sick symbiotic relationship between the goals of power and greed. The perverse troika of amoral politician, complicit regulator, and abetting banker has borne America a bazturd child. One that threatens all the pillars of American Democracy.
I wonder if in Rome's waning days its recalcitrant pundits were trying to rationalize the irrational?
Empire, always fleeting, is never defeated from without - it is always from within. And in this case one need look no further than the Conservative mirror to see the culprit. Reaganomics, thy name is mud. The only trickle down you ever bring is abuse of power.
Wishing the likes of Kristol and Will no ill-will, I pray they fare better than Shakespeare's 'Cinna, the Poet' from "Julius Caesar", who you may recall "a mob, eager for blood" kills using the "excuse that they never liked his poems much anyway". Such is the fate of facile mouthpieces. Beware the mob Kristol and Will! Brooks, you be careful too.
— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada
September 24th, 2008 10:48 am
"Experience demands that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the general prey of the rich on the poor." - Thomas Jefferson
Today in the Washington Post George Will observed "The essence of this crisis is lack of knowledge, including the inability to know who owes what to whom, and where risk resides." Of course this is the same pundit who once observed: "The future has a way of arriving unannounced." Well, the future is here. The American economy is in tatters. Congressional oversight, always a dream, is soon to be a nightmare. And the 'free market' is but a corrupt joke.
The brand of political and economic freedom prized so dearly by the likes of G. Will and W. Kristol has failed. Its potential sold short. Sold on the cheap. Sold on the backs of the American public.
George Will once opined: "Americans are overreaching; overreaching is the most admirable and most American of the many American excesses." Now with capitalist excess rotting the foundation of the once "shining house on a hill" its time he recanted.
The incestuous relationship long championed by the right wing mouth pieces turns out to have been built on nothing but a sick symbiotic relationship between the goals of power and greed. The perverse troika of amoral politician, complicit regulator, and abetting banker has borne America a bazturd child. One that threatens all the pillars of American Democracy.
I wonder if in Rome's waning days its recalcitrant pundits were trying to rationalize the irrational?
Empire, always fleeting, is never defeated from without - it is always from within. And in this case one need look no further than the Conservative mirror to see the culprit. Reaganomics, thy name is mud. The only trickle down you ever bring is abuse of power.
Wishing the likes of Kristol and Will no ill-will, I pray they fare better than Shakespeare's 'Cinna, the Poet' from "Julius Caesar", who you may recall "a mob, eager for blood" kills using the "excuse that they never liked his poems much anyway". Such is the fate of facile mouthpieces. Beware the mob Kristol and Will! Brooks, you be careful too.
— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada
Monday, September 8, 2008
Query on Kristol comment
fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/08/opinion/08kristol.html?s=2
Dear Moderator,
re: the comment pasted below I tried to post earlier. Was it deemed unworthy because I called Mr. Kristol a 'pompous priss'? If it was, my profuse apologies. At least I choose not to characterize him as a desperate intellectual master-bator.
If, on the other hand, the issue was my lack of a 'real name' - my name is _____ _______ of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
*** original post ***
Mr. Kristol,
Kudos! Obsfucation par excellence!
Granted there may be a few spurious media stories concerning Palin and her qualifications. Yet, for the most part the media is only asking one thing of Gov. Palin - forthright transparency on the issues.
Curiously, writers of your ilk see no problem with the fact that she refuses to speak for herself in an uncontrolled media setting?
What would you be saying if Biden was unavailable to one and all - save 'staged' events?
Doubt you would be so understanding you pompous priss!
— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada
Dear Moderator,
re: the comment pasted below I tried to post earlier. Was it deemed unworthy because I called Mr. Kristol a 'pompous priss'? If it was, my profuse apologies. At least I choose not to characterize him as a desperate intellectual master-bator.
If, on the other hand, the issue was my lack of a 'real name' - my name is _____ _______ of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
*** original post ***
Mr. Kristol,
Kudos! Obsfucation par excellence!
Granted there may be a few spurious media stories concerning Palin and her qualifications. Yet, for the most part the media is only asking one thing of Gov. Palin - forthright transparency on the issues.
Curiously, writers of your ilk see no problem with the fact that she refuses to speak for herself in an uncontrolled media setting?
What would you be saying if Biden was unavailable to one and all - save 'staged' events?
Doubt you would be so understanding you pompous priss!
— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada
Bill Kristol- Pompous Priss
from: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/08/opinion/08kristol.html?s=2
September 08, 2008 10:59 am
Mr. Kristol,
Kudos! Obsfucation par excellence!
Granted there may be a few spurious media stories concerning Palin and her qualifications. Yet, for the most part the media is only asking one thing of Gov. Palin - forthright transparency on the issues.
Curiously, writers of your ilk see no problem with the fact that she refuses to speak for herself in an uncontrolled media setting?
What would you be saying if Biden was unavailable to one and all - save 'staged' events?
Doubt you would be so understanding you pompous priss!
September 08, 2008 10:59 am
Mr. Kristol,
Kudos! Obsfucation par excellence!
Granted there may be a few spurious media stories concerning Palin and her qualifications. Yet, for the most part the media is only asking one thing of Gov. Palin - forthright transparency on the issues.
Curiously, writers of your ilk see no problem with the fact that she refuses to speak for herself in an uncontrolled media setting?
What would you be saying if Biden was unavailable to one and all - save 'staged' events?
Doubt you would be so understanding you pompous priss!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
