Another useless Margaret Wente Column

So what am I, chopped liver?

MARGARET WENTE

Originally from Tuesday's Globe and Mail

December 23, 2008 at 12:00 AM EST

Dear Prime Minister,

I didn't mean it! Honest! Just because I called you a vindictive control freak doesn't mean I don't hold you and the Conservative Party in the highest esteem. If my remarks about your conduct and personality have sometimes seemed a bit tart, I assure you they were always offered in the spirit of continuous improvement.

In my heart, I've always been true blue. Even though I live in Toronto's Beaches, a territory notoriously bristling with latte-loving CBC types and elitist gala-goers, I have voted for your party in every single election, regardless of the fitness of the local candidate, who usually comes fourth behind the Greens. Please don't tell my girlfriends.

So can't you find a Senate seat for me, too? If Mike Duffy and Pamela Wallin can be senators, then surely there is room for me. Like them, I am a lifelong hack. Maybe I haven't been on TV as much, but you know what they say about television hosts. They can pronounce, but they can't spell. I can do both! Also, not to be critical, but you may have noticed that Pam has too much hair and Duff doesn't have enough. I have just the right amount.

Seriously, you can't deny that I have what it takes to be a first-class senator. I am accustomed to being underworked and overpaid, and I am able to emit hot air on any subject on demand. Ask Duff. I've been on his show lots of times. He'll tell you I have glib and superficial opinions about everything, especially things I know nothing about.

Some people believe that journalists are automatically unsuited to sit in the chamber of sober second thought, because we are seldom either sober or thoughtful. Clearly, Sir, you disagree. You understand that the media are part of the establishment now.

We journalists used to take pride in afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted. But we've discovered that it's far more rewarding to do things the other way around. Especially when the payoff is a chance to serve our country in such a vital and important role. And if the Senate is full up for now, I'd be happy to serve as the consul-general in New York, so long as there's an adequate entertainment budget.

To tell the truth, Your Honour, an appointment to the Senate couldn't come at a better time for me. The future isn't looking all that bright. Everybody's reading the news online, and a lot of newspapers are going bust. My bosses have actually been going over my expense account and are nagging me to start a blog. (Do you know what a blog is? I'm not sure, either.)

Frankly, my talents are better suited to a more deliberative forum, one where there's a lot of time for debate and naps. As for the emoluments, I assure you they are completely irrelevant compared to the chance to serve my country. The $130,400-a-year salary, indexed to inflation until I retire or reach 75 (whichever comes first), is meaningless to me. The pension is still indexed, I presume.

There are rumours, no doubt untrue, that my pal Duff has been lobbying for a Senate seat ever since Brian Mulroney was in office. The way things are going, Your Excellency, I don't have that long. So maybe we can strike a deal. From now on, I'll cut the sarcasm and reveal to readers what I know to be the truth. You are that rarest of men in public life - a statesman, a visionary, one who combines heart and head and never stoops to petty political revenge when the nation's future is at stake.

You have been cruelly misunderstood, and I intend to do my best to fix that.

Thank you, Sir, for your valuable time. I am grateful for the opportunity to set the record straight, and look forward to hearing from you at your earliest opportunity.

*** Below My Posted Comment ****

You (BeerBelly Buddah, from Canada) wrote: You have to believe there were those of us cloistered in prayer for weeks on your behalf. All we wanted, all we desired, all we conspired to do was pray enough so that you too may have been elevated to the Red Chamber. At least then your words would only be polluting an anachronistic body rather than a national newspaper. I crap better opines out of my aging body everyday than you tap with your haggard fingers connected to that pea brain of yours. You a Senator - what's next? The Apocalypse?

{*** originally posted in early AM - apparently a particular word (orifice?) may have been offending? It is here redacted.}

• Posted 23/12/08 at 9:24 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment

Confessions of a 'Last Minute Shopper'.

Twenty-six years and counting. That's how long I've been a 'last minute shopper'. And I'm happy to report that, once again, despite driving my sweet spouse raving mad, I have proved the efficacy of my approach to Christmas gift buying.

Earlier this morning my spouse dropped me off at the mall saying: "I can't believe you insist on doing this every year! It's just crazy! What if you can't find what people want."

"Then I'll buy what they need," I said.

"Ugh," she emoted.

"Love you dear," I said, "be good for Mom kids, see you soon!"

List in hand, kid free and unrestrained by anybody's opinion on the merits of my choices I proceeded to wander the mall in a relaxed fashion. If a store or boutique was too busy: I simply avoided it. If I couldn't find the particular item on my list, I improvised. If the lady with crazy-eyes and an overflowing cart was intent on cutting me off, I put my elbows out. If a fellow shopper's eyes were kind, I smiled. If downcast, I empathized. If fiery, I ignored. If the cashier was rude, I hummed. If the price was too high, I refrained. If... if it made sense I bought; if it didn't, I did not. Three hours and thirty-three minutes later I emerged from the mall with 17 gifts (not Gift Cards!). I was done!

Arriving home via cab an hour ago I announced to one and all that I was done.

"Easy for you to say," my spouse who has been shopping for six weeks said.

"Yes, beauty, it easy for me to say. That's why I do it!" I replied smiling. And she laughed, ... and it is Christmas ... and it is simple.

Merry Christmas!

Ah, Consultation at Last!

You know your kinda screwed when:


REGINA _ Saskatchewan wants to do a better job of consulting with First Nations and Metis before approving industrial projects that affect traditional lands.

The government has released draft rules that the province and companies would have to follow in energy, mining and forestry developments.

The rules would require industry to contact aboriginal groups in the early planning stages and provide clear and accurate information about a project and its potential effects.

First Nations Minister June Draude says the province wants feedback on the first phase of the proposal by the end of February.

This winter, the province wants to begin looking at how aboriginals can share in economic growth and come up with a way to resolve disputes over traditional land use.

Draude said the government plans to start consultations next spring.

** What the article is really saying is that: in Brad Wall's Saskatchewan, the resource sector will now 'consult' before it rapes!

.

Recession, Depression & Drug Sales

Dec. 14 - Wal-Mart's chief executive said on Sunday he sees changes in the habits of the chain's customers as they contend with the recession, . . . . "In our pharmacy group, we have increases in prescription drugs, but not at the same rate it was," he said. "What we're seeing is an increase in self-treatment."

Don't know how I missed this last week? But it's a sign we Christmas shoppers should be worried! An increase in depressed and 'self-medicating' Wal-Mart customers roaming through the store's generic Big-Boxes seems likely to take all the fun out of shopping. It's also too bad for Wal-Mart that their growth in pharmaceutical sales is "not at the same rate it was".

Kinda makes one doubt the existence of Santa Claus during these hard times!

But Wal-Mart's CEO Lee Scott observed that an Obama plan to deal with the crisis was a great "opportunity" to get to get Health Care Reform moving in the right direction. Yeah, nothing like a new national program to get those drug sales up! As to whether or not the crisis was also an opportunity for Wal-Mart to give its employees "living wages" - CEO Scott said nothing.


.

What Would Aristotle Utter?

"In an interview ... Papandreou said Greek youths feel a deepening sense of social inequality and injustice that is driving them to riot."

Go figure? After 2,500 years of playing with "democracy" you think they would have solved this problem!

Oh well, I'm sure it's just a passing phase.


.

Kill the Christmas Concert - Kill it Fast

I have an abiding hatred for the annual public school charade known as the 'Christmas' Concert'. An anachronistic holdover from a less secular era; school organized Xmas concerts should be abolished!

I come by this epiphany naturally, but it was reinforced a week ago as I tried to rationalize to my eldest daughter why she was now subject to the ritual as an attendee (rather than participant) and was to sit with the rest of us in the crammed hot sweaty local school gym.

"But, Dad I don't go this school anymore - why do I have to be here?"

"Look, I sat through seven of your concerts in this school and you're damn well gonna sit through this one to watch your younger siblings!"

"But, Dad that's not fair!"

"No, it never is! Now sit, watch and suffer!"

Aside from the fact the school was breaking every fire code regulation imaginable to fit everybody in - it was really the activity on the stage populated by our sweet young darlings that got my goat. So mind-numbingly bad as to defy description, the charade was not only painful to watch, it was impossible to hear amid the coughs, sneezes, and the cries of innocents dragged by doting parents to watch their elementary kin don absurd winter themed costumes and sing really bad songs.

When it was over my eldest turned to me and said (incredulously): "My God Dad that was horrible! Were mine always that bad?"

"Yup," I said, "And next year will be no different."

To which she said: "Dad, they should abolish the Christmas Concert now!"

Hear, hear!

THIS JUST IN: Copy of Harper's Real Speech from last night.

WHAT HARPER REALLY WANTED TO SAY: ALTERNATE COPY OF STEPHEN HARPER'S SPEECH - Dec. 3rd, 2008

My fellow Conservatives, ... err, I mean other Canadians too, - - thanks for watching me try to salvage my tainted government. errr... [forced smile] ... errr,

Tonight, I put my case before all true-blue Canadians and, of course, those who call 'talk radio'. I also put it before all you flaky pinko-socialists, Newfie Wingnuts, and Frenchy nationalists. After Minister Flaherty's economic mis-statement I realized my government's message was not getting through. Tonight I set the record straight.

While it's true I went too far in trying to crush the opposition last week; you must understand that I did it to protect all Canadian's from having their money support those bazturd parties who represent 63% of voters.

True, I violated my earlier pledge to govern differently.

True I went back on my word to "govern responsibly".

Also, it is true I opted to take the cheapest of shots.

But, my fellow Canadian's - real and not - you must realize why I did it.

I did it because I am pathologically incapable of 'playing well with others'.

Moreover, I firmly believe that the 'other' has no place in this polity - not the 'other' not born here - but those "others" who do not think as I and my mute and muzzled ministers do.

But these past few days have been taught me a valuable lesson. I must start to reign in my petty-inner child. I must hide him from you and, as such, I make a solemn pledge that from now on my agenda will stay well hidden from one and all... even my Ministers.

Thanks to my ineptness, we find ourselves at a historic crossroads. To the my fellow Conservatives, I say thank you for standing by me this week! To the rest, I say listen to my lies as I try to sucker you into supporting me.

I’d like to thank my ever patient wife Laureen for standing by me through these difficult times. Although today I stepped on our poor cat, regrettably killing poor pussy, Laureen continues to stand by me and give me her ideas: smile more often, stop looking predatory, change the colour of your reptilian eyes, etc,. I flaccidly thank her for her support and patience. You see Canada, I am just like 50% of you, I simply could not do it without my first wife. See, I too am human.

Many of you know that, despite the pressures of our young family, Laureen frequently visits riding associations on my behalf because I am creepy looking and frighten young children at local gatherings. Again, thank-you!

Friends, we all know that it is the strength of family and hatred of opponents that drives us. Life’s ups and downs are nothing if not an opportunity to best those around you. And we’ve got plenty to celebrate together. Just last month, we Conservatives scored a victory that firmly established us as the biggest, broadest, and most national of Canada’s political parties. Okay, so I pissed away all the good will right away -but hey, it's who I am.

Conservatism is Canada! Such is as it should be.

I know we all just went through a totally unnecessary election. Well, sorry to say that its time to do it again... in the dead of winter.

But, fear not, via a renewed indoctrination to our cause - - - errr, [Harper's eyes go wild and involuntarily he shouts] Sieg Hiel, Sieg Hiel ... [gasping] ... oh, sorry my fellow Canadian's .... errr, as you can see this current crisis is bringing out the worst in me. Sorry 'bout that ... Laureen must have forgotten to put my meds in the O.J. this morning. Again, sorry 'bout that.. heh, heh, heh, ...

I now admit I need your help and I call on all like-minded Canadians, NO I beseech you, to work fervently to convert all those treasonous political infidels willing to support a coalition that would usurp my kingdom. We must, by trick or by trade, fool the unbelievers to support our Conservative Government and our plan. Having pissed my chance away, I call on you again to save me.

I need the help of Conservatives like the small-businessman Small Pot, nephew of Pol Pot, who successfully threatened thousands of Cambodian refugees into supporting me in October. I need the help of Conservatives like Herb Ganja in the Lower Mainland who was a stalwart promoter of our Conservative message in the ethnic media. We must fool them again. He and friends must seize every opportunity to pull the wool over the eyes of new Canadians again.

Conservatives like Righty Wingnut from Edmonton, who organized a goher shoot-a-thon to raise money to fund our party. Gear up and load again Righty - you have shoot for Conservatism again!

Conservatives like Wonky Politzki in Selkirk Interlake, who worked tireless hours 36 straight days to help re-elect James Bezan - well Wonky we need you to do it all over again ... sorry Wonky.

Conservatives such as Luc-Josée Lobotomy, in Chutes-et-Scores Quebec who almost reaped us more votes and almost made a difference last time. Well, we need you to toil in futility again.

Eternally grateful to volunteers like Small-Pot, Herb, Righty, Wonky, and Luc-Josee and the thousands of others like them across the country I call again on you to again rekindle your misplaced support. After my crazed political power-play, it goes without saying, I need you help.

As I speak tonight, let us pause a moment, and reflect on how far we have fallen since October 14th. Winning a mandate to govern in good faith - I blew it. Thus, the Conservative movement in this country is in jeopardy and demoralized. Barely alive in Quebec. It is being ridiculed even on my own backbenches. The pundits are dissing us; and the public is saying “don’t bother talking to us until you’ve got your act together.” Well, we will show them!

We will kill this consensus building political juggernaut poised to take over MY Prime Minister’s Office. We will continue to denigrate and assail our opponents with vitriolic venom. A COALITION! Who ever heard of such an absurdity?

Friends, we all remember those days …when a Conservative Government seemed about as likely as a Prime Minister Gilles Duceppe! Well, thanks to my actions he is closer than ever to the prize. But friends, no worries, our sense of duty will overcome. We will focus on the things that divide us and things that seem so small, and unite around my leadership. I know, I know: I fucked it up! But we can overcome.

I will meet with the Governor General and re-affirm how my unwavering commitment to screwing over the 'other' will serve me well should she assent to my begging plea. I will show how only we offer Quebeckers real polarization and can stoke the fires of sovereignty. Only we can force the creation of a Québécois nation which is confident, united, autonomous, proud, united, and independent of Canada. It is now closer than ever. And when those freaking good for nothing frogs leave it will allow me to forge a western based Anglo-majority in the reconfigured parliament that will guarantee our Reichstag's future.

Five years ago this fall, my fellow Conservatives, ,,,, errr and others , my party came together. We united forces, energized our supporters and began to throw wool over Canada's eyes. We pretended to offer Canadians a viable alternative and we almost got away with it. A majority was so close I could taste it. If only all had my values, we would have won it. Now we must commit anew to demonize the opponents to get what we need. Dion is the unelectable anti-christ, Layton the fallen arch-angel, and Duceppe the devil. This troika must not be allowed to stand. If the G.G. should not agree with me, I say, "Fuck the G.G., follow me and I will lead you to Nirvana."

Although faux-Canadians re-affirmed their decision last month that I was unworthy of a majority - - let's make them pay!

Friends, I ask for a new mandate, a crazy-assed mandate! A mandate for the ages amid all this global economic instability. We must be given carte balnche, I must prevail.

We are clear in our request. Screw the confidence of the House. Give us time to manipulate ourselves into a majority situation!!! Prorogue or else! While Canadians were unwilling to give it last time, I must stay in power.

Only the Conservative party is Canada’s party!

In Quebec, we had a breakthrough in 2006, despite the fearmongering of the Bloc. Now those bazturds are turning on us! Go figure? But friends, we will no longer be distracted by the demagogic tactics of the Bloc! Off with their heads! While I may have turned the improbable into the possible and facilitated the birth of a coalition. Turned the doable minority government into the unmanageable - I ask for your support.

Okay, so I screwed up last week - but really, should that be held against me?? I thinks not.

Canadians we face challenges that I alone created. Challenges that appear bigger than anything we have seen in decades, but challenges we must nevertheless work to get through, together (without the other). From the very first day of the recent campaign, we put the economy first (until I didn't). Even before the campaign, we had been acting to deal with the effects of the U.S. financial crisis here and around the world (until I forgot to pay attention).

So, to be clear, I fucked up, but our new campaign must lay out additional steps to move Canada forward. (Those I neglected to mention last week.) The global economy is taking a serious turn for the worse - I want to make the most of the crisis and frighten Canadians into voting for me again.

While Canadians chose us in October, and chose a clear approach over improvisation. They chose stability over risk. And they chose dealing with hard realities over the promise of easy answers. Too bad, so sad it all went to hell. But no conciliation is needed.

Friends, while we won the election because we listened to Canadians, because we offered a realistic plan, and because we had earned Canadians’ trust it turned out I could not honour that responsibility. Again, so sorry, so sad -support me now so I may pretend to change my spots.

Ladies and gentlemen, we must not be under any illusions. The effects of this crisis will continue. And make no mistake, there are much more difficult and unstable times ahead. But only I, unprepentant and unbowed can get us through this. And our country will emerge stronger and more Conservative than ever before.

The Conservative party is Canada’s party!

We are the party that has been there for Canada since the beginning. This is the party whose legacy movements have built and renewed our country.

We, Conservatives, founded the Canadian federation in 1867, creating one of the most durable political arrangements in the world today. Conservatives bound Canada together from coast to coast with the Canadian Pacific Railway. Let me preside over its utter dissolution.

Past and present, no party has a better record of bringing Canadians together and of standing up for our country’s interests. Ha, ha, ha, .... sorry that's hard to say with a straight face. Again, the Conservative Party is Canada’s party!

And we will succeed because Conservative values are Canadian values:

• A love of power.
• A commitment to tedium.
• Devotion to disarray.
• Respect for nothing but us.
• Reward for risky leadership.

These are my values. Values about people from one walk of life joining together to keep the 'other' at bay. A story about harnessing grass-roots ignorance to overcome legitimate challenges to our orthodoxy. It reflects a story about building alone that which should be built together.

I may have created the most unstable political environment Canada has ever known. I may have squandered opportunity at every turn. Created a place where you’re afraid to read the headlines day in, day out. Yet I demand the privilege to continue my work.

As a Conservative, I take this privilege for granted.

Because the Conservative party is Canada’s party!

We put our partisan interests first.

We’ve skewed our priorities. We’ve enhanced ideological tensions. We've delayed family focused legislation. We are giving families little of much-needed relief. We’ve stood up for our values above all else. We enhanced provincial jurisdictions and are committed to the withering away of the federal state.

We’ve sensationalized criminal statistics in an effort to frighten all Canadians unnecessarily. Punitive criminal justice is our way. We say we do so in favour of victims and law-abiding citizens. But really we just want to keep public attention away from other issues.

We will continue to do so. Whether at home or abroad, whether it’s easy or hard, we will not hesitate to do what’s best for us first and then the rest of Canada.

Because the Conservative party is Canada’s party!

Friends, I don’t have to tell you that winning the election was a crucial step. But now we face enormous challenges. Our work has only begun. And we will have to be both tough, beligerent and wholly unstrategic. Pragmatism is not our way. Unrealistic ideological goals are our game.

And, friends, I aver we are entitled to be in government and that certain groups of Canadians owe us their vote. We must work hard to keep Canadians fooled. We must listen to no voices but or own. We must stay united, we must stay in government. We must best the opposition.

I feel we can achieve these things because, thankfully, the Party’s greatest strength lies in its inbred grassroots membership. No Party’s members are more motivated or ignorant. No Party’s members are more dedicated or narrow-minded. No Party’s members are better prepared or better-suited to back an ideological whore like me.

So in the coming days, be sure to make the most of the opportunities to spread half-truths and falsehoods. Debate and refine our party’s lying premise and policies, share experiences with your fellow group-thinkers and learn from each other about how to obsfucate the real issue - my leadership.

As we enter a period of great challenges, never forget the strengths of our ideology and never lose sight of the bias within us.

Canadians asked us to lead at a critical time of global economic instability. We failed. They now ask us to reconsider our approach - I will not. It is a situation they know I created - but it is one over which I will prevail.

Conservatives have never been afraid of tough times. And, as we have done time and time again in our history, we will answer our country’s call. And with your help, I will demonize the 'other' obsfucate the truth, divide this country and emerge stronger than ever before.

Thank you very much. God bless our land.

Blessed are the Knowing

Ahhh, Wisdom Blogger Widgets -

"You are the Sun
I am the moon,
You are the means
I am the tune...
Play Me."

At last, I am learning how this Blog thing works!

Maybe someday, somebody will actually read it... ha, ha, ha,

Kristol again offers nothing new

Kristol,

Stating the bleeding obvious does not a column make, but I guess it is too much to be hoped for your column to offer anything 'new'.

Yes, 'a new' paradigm is needed. Yes, Obama must think 'anew'. Yes, those who wish to help must think 'anew' too. Too bad it seems so hard for you. More substance if you will... please.

Hillary Clinton? More than an American Choice.

Mr. Friedman,

Haunted by ambivalence since the 'Clinton for State' story broke, I could not place my ruddy nicotine stained finger on the reason for my angst until, blessedly, your column set my simple-mind's eye straight. It captured my feelings perfectly.

Drawing a clear distinction between the inane drama the petty are peddling re: 'Clinton for State' and the true import of what must be taken into account by Mr. Obama as he makes this decision was spot on. Of course, many may wonder why a beer-swilling Canuck such as myself should concern himself with who the president-elect appoints as his US Secretary of State? The answer is simple, their exists a collective 'we', a 'we' consisting of the other western democracies, who recognize that an incoming US administration's choice for who becomes the public face of American policy on the world's stage can make or break our shared economic and democratic ideals. As such, the last thing we wish to see is any appointment that diminishes the honest brokering required to both address and protect our collective concerns.

As you point out, as long as Obama has Hillary's back, in exchange for her pledge to adopt a stance akin to filial respect for his foreign agenda, then all should be well. Given the choice, if I were Obama I would take a chance on Hillary. By all appearances Mrs. Clinton is a serious and professional politician. Her chance to marry her gifts to an Obama presidency should not be sold short. And any discussion of Bill's role is extraneous - he is, and shall remain, a lightening rod - but a lightening rod who recognizes its place is not always a bad thing.

Cheers,

Brooks and the whittling away of the middle-class.

Brooks,

The "former" class of which you speak is indeed facing an economic reality that could lead to its extinction. Of course, in a country that continues to see the gap widen between its richest and poorest members how could it be otherwise?

Any 'democracy' where 10% of the population controls 70%+ of the national wealth (with the top 1% controlling 40%) while its poorest 40% control less than 1% of the national wealth is doomed to see its center, its core, its middle, succumb to a fate that is less than kind.

As long as the rules that allow for this perverse concentration of wealth remain unchecked then 'staying-middle-class' will continue its downward trend. With the "American Dream" becoming too rich for most. A mirage.

Those seeking to preserve the currently flawed stock-market and offshore trading system under the guise that capital investment in innovation must be protected at all costs have no interest in altering the status-quo to help the middle-class. Their only interest is in preserving the elite's privileged position. Nothing will change until new oversight mechanisms are introduced that will prod American investors to look first to the needs of the domestic economy rather than allow them to move their profits offshore.

Obama need not walk alone

Dear WaPa,

While it's true the West faces a "delicate" task in balancing the sharing of "more wealth and power with non-Western countries" as it tries to fix the present economic cluster-fook - - your assertion that Obama need provide the public face as well as shoulder the entire reform argument needed to meet the "terms consistent with U.S. interests and values" is flawed. There is one notable omission in your analysis - the role of the American capitalist.

Unless America's economic elite is willing to recognize how its unfailing pursuit of short-term quarterly profits compromises the long-term preservation of the global free-market economy no lasting solution will be possible. Political directed action alone cannot solve this crisis. D.C. centered initiatives are doomed to fail unless those who control the levers of credit reconcile their lending practices with the unsustainable simple-minded investors Pavlovian impulse to seek out the quickest buck. Unless US credit-markets undertake to support new businesses (new neo-capitalists) who have business plans based on lower short-term returns but married to realistic innovations promising to capture tomorrow's 'just-in-time' technologies - the US economy is doomed.

Until the US investor, US businessman, US broker and banker collectively recognize America is on the cusp of an structural abyss that not only threatens the world's free-market economy but US security as well - - and as long as they refuse to reconsider their modus-operandi and lower their collective expectations, then bail-out initiatives will merely serve to placate, rather than solve, the market's systemic flaws.

Much like the "plague", if left untreated , market uncertainty will continue to re-visit US capitalism again and again until one day, like the Missouri Mandan, it will find itself succumbing to an unforgiving pathogen capable of gutting an entire economic culture. Like the long gone Dodo bird, American capitalism risks toying with extinction unless it adapts and proselytizes about its new found patience for backing sustainable development.

Should America's business culture fail to redefine its ideological ethos and question the world's taste for quick profit, then all democratically run markets are apt to fall victim to domestically driven retrenchment strategies. To be clear, the president-elect is not the only character in this drama who must act . It is incumbent on those who peddle, seek, or hoard capital to now rethink their socio-economic roles. If they do not, then any palliative legislative solution introduced by Mr. Obama is fated to fail. Until US capitalists can put aside their individual short-term agenda's and act "collectively" (yes, a la Marx) to restore the world's confidence in the capacity of the US to adapt and innovate in face of profit challenges then capitalism as we know it is, quite obviously, doomed.

President-Elect Obama need not face this crisis alone. Ultimately those who bear the greatest burden for rescuing American capitalism are, ironically[?], America's Capitalist's.

Rich proves columns need not be poor.

Mr. Rich,

Well said. Amid all the daily pundit-dung and dry drivel that tries to pass itself off as legitimate commentary, your columns consistently demonstrates that all is not lost. Your work proves it's possible for those writers willing to put work into the reflective (rather than reactive) phase of political writing can produce reasoned assessments of the partisan landscape that not only engage the reader, but inform the debate. A rare gift - too bad so many of your contemporaries have not set their sights higher to emulate your model.

If the GOP is serious about resurrecting its bankrupt ideological message it should launch a search to find your conservative Doppleganger to articulate its case. Of course, that assumed the GOP right-wing and its moderates can actually unite and come up with something worth articulating?

In the meantime, keep up the campaign calling for the genesis of a cogent and viable opposition to oppose Obama's policies. Not only is an opposition necessary - but were it to both robust and credible - it could only help shape his priorities in ways that could only benefit his presidency.

Religion may have its place, but it must be a private place.

The sacred beliefs of the few, or even the many, do not have a preordained right to public platforms.

Keeping government controlled secular space free of religious messages or any other form of belief specific iconography is the cornerstone of the separation of Church and State. This principle must protected - just as the free speech rights of religious groups must be protected when they seek to hold their gatherings under the roofs of their 'private' houses of worship. For any religious group to aver differently is, well, simply un-American.

Kristol & the GOP: Barking up the wrong tree... again

Kristol,

Your column is going to the dogs.

With nary a mention of the real issues facing the GOP, you again cling to the spurious notion that the US is "still a center right country" by saying the election results weren't really as bad as they could have been? Your tea-leaf reading of the voters reported ideological self-identification is not just weak - its absurd. A loss is a loss, and the GOP's demonstrable failure to broaden its base beyond its mostly white, mostly reactionary, old style republicanism is the real issue. Too bad the best advice you could offer your like-minded brethren was that "it wouldn’t hurt" for the "possible 2012 G.O.P. nominees to begin bringing some puppies home for their kids" to broaden their electoral popular appeal? Absurd.

There is only one thing left to say re: your banal analysis.

WOOF!

George Will's take on Obama's voice

Georgie Boy,

Let us get a few things straight. Yes, G.W. Bush's term was, as you point out, defined by war. However, stating that Lincoln's presidency was the last to be so defined is simply wrong - have you forgotten about LBJ? You remember that era don't you? Surely you haven't forgotten - It was about the time you got your draft deferment?

re: your assertion today's economic conditions "have put a polar frost" on the "ambitions" of the recently elected "liberals". Is today's paradox any different than 1932? Yes, in one respect, armed with a history of how and why the reach of FDR's New Deal exceeded its grasp, left-leaning democrats can be expected to temper their irrational impulses and dreams under the tutelage of president-elect Obama's leadership. How could it be otherwise?

Rather than viewing his upcoming challenge as an "affliction" - you should see it for what it is: opportunity borne of crisis. Which leads to a final point; yes, you are right, Obama will find his presidential voice - but if he is to exemplify 'real change' one hardly expects you will like the tune he hums. And that, is how it should be.

McCain Undone by Selfish Tongue

Re; Dowd's "Who's the Question Mark?"

The tragedy of American politics is that, too often, men of integrity sell their souls. McCain's desperate last acts speak volumes. Rarely does human drama of such Shakespearean portions play itself out on such a grand scale. Pity the old prince at the center of the tragedy opted to forgo his dignity in his lust for the keys to the Castle.

As the curtain draws, all he he has left America with is a taste of vile partisanship - based on the unfounded fear of the 'other'. Alas, if politics reveals the measure of a man - McCain may well find himself on Nov. 5th in front of the the mirror realizing he is but a shell of his past promise, muttering all the while "Done to death by slanderous tongue".

Of course, the tongue of which he speaks will have been his own.
Was the Hero that here lies"O happy dagger!
This is thy sheath; there rust, and let me die."

Not all Hero's are Republicans

Kristol,

Palin's assertion (and your concurrence) that only John McCain “has truly fought for America” is telling. It highlights the fundamental flaws of neo-cons like yourself who believe mistakenly that all American 'wars' are foreign and not domestic. Blind to the needs of homeland's citizenry you confuse military service, albeit noble, with patriotism.

Indeed, they are many fronts in the battle for the preservation of the nation today and some choose to fight on the fields at home, in the inner cities, and yes as community organizers. Their commitment to the war on inequality and poverty at home, to the war against upper class entitlements are no less important. Heroes come in all shapes and colours and, despite your assertions to the contrary, John McCain is far from the only 'hero' this season who is standing before the American people and pledging to fight for them.

Health Reform But a Dream?

October 24th, 2008 2:55 am
Gentleman,

A noble article, But fraught with folly. The only way to improve US health care, lower costs and maximize outcomes is to break the back of the 'for-profit' insurers and their Big-Pharma brethren. The greatest impediment to meaningful health reform is the hegemonic hold of the above mentioned parties. Any attempt to 'reform' the existing system is doomed unless it addresses the current power imbalance between the 'providers for profit' and the patient.

Kristol's Vulgus - a Crack in need of a viel.

October 20th, 2008 1:30 am

Kristol, so your joining Joe the Plumber in his crusade? Good luck. The only problem is you share little with this unaccredited plumber beyond your hatred for Obama. However, like plumbers the world over, you too have a stereotypical crack that requires covering up - unfortunately though your duplicitous crack has teeth and has a place of prominence on your visage - vulgus indeed!

Obama dull? Hardly Mr. Brooks.

Mr. Brooks,

Your fear that Obama may turn out to be "an observer" rather than a "leader" is unfounded. Evidence suggests Obama will be anything but a passive president. Criticized early on by people like you on the right for his soaring rhetoric, Obama was forced to dial down his passionate pleas to the electorate in order to mitigate baseless attacks that tried to pigeonhole him as an empty lofty dreamer. Yet, once the election is over Obama will be free to reengage the voters on an emotional level, to reengage the issues on a personal level, to speak once again in the language of a purposeful poet with a heartfelt vision for the future.

If anything, Obama post election will be free to shed the yolk of blandness his strategists rationalized he needed to project net votes from the heartland. He will be free, once again, to be 'himself'.

Far from a remote and 'dull' figure, in office, one should anticipate that with his passion unfettered by cold electoral calculations, he will yet again bring an engagement and driven approach to the issues. I believe there is little danger he will manifest decision-making paralysis - if anything his administration will one of activist compassionate pragmatism borne of a purpose not witnessed in decades.

Far from a 'celebrity', Obama is, in every sense of the word, a national politician. And at this juncture in American history that is exactly what is needed. Blind ideologues like Bush, and me-firster's like Clinton have had their chance. The country is ready to embrace a true politician.

The last debate? Not so fast.

Well, at least that's over, and by and large, it must be admitted the three debates were more redeeming than originally anticipated. At least the candidates made an effort to keep the discourse civil, if not always accurate. And while things will now take their inevitable course, nobody should think that last night marked the end to debates this silly season. After Nov. 4th there needs to be a real debate between the Executive Branch and Congress to streamline the process and minimize legislative dysfunction in 2009 and beyond.

In the coming debate the new President will have clearly lay out all aspects of his agenda and demand more of his party, more of his allies, more of his Congress. Only then can he rightfully turn to the American people to demand more. Without this debate Congress will continue to wallow in mediocrity and substitute partisanship for governance. This must not be allowed to stand. A debate surrounding a renewal of the federal government is long overdue. American goals must be clearly defined and agreed to - otherwise all we can expect is more inane parochial infighting. More than three men around a table, this debate will have to involve all those who dwell around the shining house on the hill before it is foreclosed upon.

Amusing Absurdities: Falling thru Failing.

October 14th, 2008 9:30 am
Today, here in Northern Mexico (aka Canada) we head to the polls. Like our equally dysfunctional southern neighbour, our federal campaign was largely devoid of any serious discussion surrounding the country's general apathy towards our withering school system. All recent debates surrounding the current 'state of education' were framed around the same old ideological positions of our right and left wing parties. More funding vs. less taxes. No one was willing to engage in seriously engage the real problem. Illiteracy. No one was willing to highlight how continuing our presently flawed pedagogical policies was going to adversely effect our ability to graduate students able to innovate and compete on a global scale. In short, nobody was willing to state the obvious: that we are rearing yet another generation of marginal thinkers doomed to become marginal workers.

A hard message to for sure, no candidate had the fortitude to tell us parents/voters that our precious children are in danger of being raised stupid, illiterate, and ignorant. As such, Canada is seemingly doomed to join the US, hand in hand, as this entire continent slides into economic and social turmoil... and ultimately into insignificance. Pity.

Honesty and vision from our politicians may have been able to reverse this situation. But, of course, that would require those who aspire to power to actually challenge voters to demand more of their children, their schools, and most of all of themselves. Unfortunately, that is not a vote getter! Thus, we will continue to counter scholastic mediocrity until, one day, it will simply be too late.

One can only hope in their third debate that either Obama or McCain will take it upon themselves to address this issue; otherwise, by avoiding the failing's of the present - you, like we Canadians- will continue to undercut the promise of your future.

You know, there's a reason the 'fall of Rome' was so poorly chronicled by its citizenry. In the end, they were so utterly uneducated that it fell to others to write their history.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Winnipeg, Canada

BeerBelly Buddah: Kristol's "The Wright Stuff" - I pity the petty.

BeerBelly Buddah: Kristol's "The Wright Stuff" - I pity the petty.

Brooks- "The Testing Time"

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/opinion/07brooks.html

October 7th, 2008 7:57 am
Brooks,

While it is true that a realignment of the world trading system is in order, the one thing missing from your piece is a prescription for how the middle classes in all Western Industrialized nations will be protected from the future global capital flow that cares little for domestic circumstances until it interferes with its ability to profit seek offshore. Perhaps it is time a mechanism was introduced to slow the flow of funds between the world's stock-exchanges? Unfettered securities and stock trading in times of crisis does little to shore-up confidence. All it does is lead to panic selling - which, as you point out, is erratic and irrational at best. Why should we rely on the same traders who got us here in the first place to somehow sort out the morass? Clearly, from Iceland to Denmark, from London to Paris, from Shanghai to New York - more oversight is needed.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Winnipeg, Canada

NYT's "The Crisis Agenda"

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/10/07/opinion/07tue1.html

October 7th, 2008 7:16 am
What Obama must highlight in the debate are the untapped assets of the American economy. He must frame the debate over the future as a choice between a status-quo under McCain, or, as an opportunity for both the federal government and the financial sector to fundamentally adjust and retool its approach to the new economic reality.

If he can justify the imperatives for his social agenda and demonstrate he will marry them to a fiscally responsible budgetary approach he will go a long way in giving the voters what they need - peace of mind that the old order will not prevail. That the needs of the middle class will come before the needs of Wall St., that Main St. is not going to be relegated to the policy back-burner.

In essence, all he has to do is convey that his administration would commit itself to bring forth a form of 'compassionate pragmatism' to the challenges of governance.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Winnipeg, Canada

Kristol's "The Wright Stuff" - I pity the petty.

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/opinion/06kristol.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin

Mr. Kristol,

Orchestration of orchestration! Wow, Ayers, Wright, and an unspecified open ended allegations that Obama is not being "wholly truthful" - all in one column! Sir, like your twisted-twin amigos, Krautcrazy and Gerson over at the WaPo, you are nothing more than a discourse distortionist.

With this column your standing as a shameless 'agent provacateur' for the McCain/Palin ticket is confirmed. Obviously they needed a messenger to formally announce the launch of their renewed "culture war" strategy. Well at least they didn't have to look too hard to find you under that rock of hyper-partisanship and divisiveness you call an ideology. The perfect lapdog, one can well imagine your delight at being picked as the messenger in this sad attempt by McCain/Palin to buttress their sagging electoral fortunes.

As to the relighting the Wright issue, nary a finer passage of a disingenuous 'interview' has ever been written. First you bring the issue up. Then she expounds. But then, she invokes a perverse form of reverse logic by saying, wholly unconvincingly, that it will really be up to McCain if it is to become an official part of the GOP strategy (or is that tactic?). Of course, by having expounded on it - she has, knowingly, just made the "appalling things that that pastor had said about our great country" again a focal point of their strategy!

As to your offer to 'volunteer' to 'moderate' a second Biden-Palin, the premise is unsound (and laughable) you wouldn't know how to "moderate" if the terms denotative definition slapped you upside your toxic cranium. You are about as equipped to serve as a debate moderator as Palin is to serve as the Vice-President.

By the way, of course, Gov, Palin seemed "confident and upbeat" despite the "strain and stress" a normal person would be feeling under the circumstances. Easy explanation there: People without a clue are often are completely ignorant of their lived context prior to their downfall. "Let them eat cake" anyone?

Mr. Kristol, I trust you are delighted by the new dark turn the McCain campaign is taking - and this fact, rather than making me angry, simply makes me pity the petty even more.

NYT's "Pitbull Palin Mauls McCain"

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/10/05/opinion/05rich.html

October 5th, 2008 5:40 am
Mr. Rich,

While McCain's medical history may, or, may not be germane to the election at hand, one thing is certain, the man's campaign is sick.

Exhibiting all the hallmarks of chronic epidemiology there is no doubt that this reactionary Republican illness runs deep. Chief among its symptoms are the current series of baseless attacks he is launching on Obama. Yesterday's accusation by Palin that Obama is "palling around with terrorists" is but the latest manifestation. Simply more proof that a sick cornered animal will resort to anything to save its skin.

Aside from Palin's perverse cache, the fundamental problem for McCain, is that he is politically incoherent. Railing against the usury practice of embedded earmarks in congressional bills, he nevertheless, voted 90% in favour of Bush's legislative agenda. Who did he think he was supporting? A 'Maverick' like him? Did he not realize that Bush was instrumental in aiding and abetting the biggest earmark of all - Wall Street's deregulation and escape from accountability?

Curious, when a Representative lobbies for a 'bridge to nowhere' it is deplorable; yet, when an entire class is given Carte Blanche to destroy the integrity of the American economy it is okay? I guess its hard for a multimillionaire to reconcile the two. McCain's inability to convey empathy that resonates is his biggest political health problem.

As for his erratic mannerisms - well, the answer may well lie in his medical history. But really, if that is where the answer resides - is there any question as to who is fittest to be the next President of the United States?

I think not.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

TNR's "Historical Manglings" - a clear choice nevertheless.

fr: http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=89fa8a91-b671-4e56-8666-017b0722e93a

Mr. Chafetz,

While it may be true that neither candidate demonstrated an absolute and firm grasp of the inherent powers associated with the role of a Vice-President. One has to ask themselves, would they rather have Palin who seemingly believes the Cheney template is desirable, or, would they prefer to have Biden who recognizes that the said template is fraught with unconstitutional danger? Admittedly, the mangling of an answer is one thing, however, the abuse power is an entirely different beast.

It goes without saying (yet I say it anyway), that no elected official in a democracy, especially no official who straddles both the executive and legislative branches should be allowed to operate outside the constitutional parameters of the law of the land. In Cheney's case, the evidence since 2001 indicates that the absolute lack of Vice-Presidential accountability in both the Executive and Legislative spheres has irreparably damaged American interests, both domestic and foreign. So really the question should be, is a continuation of this pathology in the interests of the American people? If the answer is no - then the choice could not be clearer.

Ideology and partisanship aside, no sane individual can believe Palin's tacit acceptance of the Cheney example as being worthy of replication could possibly see this as being in America's best interests? I mean, there must be a limit to the allowances of the absurdities that will be countered this silly season - doesn't there?

NYT's "Sarah's Pompom Palaver"

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/10/05/opinion/05dowd.html

October 05, 2008 3:00 am
Palin-plain-speak has arrived! How could it be otherwise? I mean what better captures the 'dumbing down' of America than the Governor's silly and under-stylized syntax?

Sad fact is, eloquence has always been looked down upon by a significant segment of the American public. Of course, few wish to acknowledge it is so because a great many voters are simply too uneducated and not equipped to discern the import of the complex ideas that often accompany eloquence.

In today's fast-food culture it should surprise no one that Palin's jingoistic, mangled jargon has become the pablum of the right. As a 'maverick' no different than many a generic homespun American, Palin's abject absurdities resonate precisely because they lack complexity. Easy digestible tortured tidbits and psycho-babble sound-bytes have a long history on late-night US television. So, again, it should come as no surprise that those familiar with the lexicon of the infomercial should gravitate to this pablum.

That being said, one simpleton a century in the White House is enough. In this case, twice would be a disaster.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

NYT's "Talking in Points"

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/opinion/04collins.html

October 4th, 2008 0:59 am
"Palin is,... a genuine heir to the women’s liberation movement of the 1970s, which tried to make sure ... American women would grow up feeling they had every right to compete with men for all the best rewards and adventures the world had to offer." You have got to be kidding! The genuine heirs of the 70s Feminine Movement should string you up for demeaning their hard fought accomplishments. I do not believe anyone serious predisposed to gender equality ever asserted a woman deserved to 'get ahead' politically simply because they were female? Equal treatment for equal merit was the goal - and in light of Gov. Palin's intellectual and analytical deficiencies - I cannot believe there are many 'true' feminists who would argue these should be overlooked by virtue of one's plumbing.

Shame on you for the false characterization of what a 'genuine heir' is - I am teaching my girls it is competence and brains that matter - not entitlement based on their gender.

While, Palin may be 'mission driven' and have learned 'how' the Alaskan political game is played - it still does not excuse her ineptness. Heiress my arse!

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

NYT's Herbert - "Palin's Alternative Universe"? The Fall of Rome?

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/opinion/04herbert.html?ref=opinion

October 4th, 2008 0:38 am
Mr. Herbert,

With respects, regarding - "it’s hard to believe that someone with Ms. Palin’s limited skills could possibly be playing a leadership role"? Well, actually sir, it is not that big a reach for some of us.

Most of the rest of the world has been nothing less than awed and dumbstruck these past eight years by who you picked the last two times. So in a way, it's not really a question of will you, or won't you. It's a question of please-be-to-God NOT AGAIN!

The vibrancy, dynamism and hallmarks of democracy that used to represent America have been damaged enough. Once your society was renowned for its ingenuity and know-how; increasingly though it is being recognized for its electoral absurdities.

Surely the time has come for moose hunting 'Joe Six-Pack' to realize he can't keep knocking up Hockey-Mom in a society without universal health insurance, without an decent school system, without an environmental plan, and without protection for the middle and lower classes. Of course, there were probably observers north of the Roman Empire 1500 years ago like me who said the same thing as that declining polity kept picking in-bred, myopic, and syphilitic Cesar's on its road to oblivion. But, hey what did they know?

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

Rex Murphy-

fr: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081003.wcomurph04/BNStory/politics/home

Dearest Delusional Rex,

Oddities of oddities, so you care not for the current debate format! Be still my beating heart! Why do you insist on regurgitating the same point you just made with Mansbridge 24 hours ago? Surely you are not just a 'one-note wonder'?

From now on, do us all a favour, end your clips with Peter on CBC by saying: "Viewers, if you're too thick or cranially challenged to see my point tonight - you can read it all again in Saturday's G&M."

At least we would all know you have nothing new to offer in the weekend column.

Despite your wish to portray this election as a done deal - it is not. the campaign still has dynamism and an unappreciated organic aspect that needs to be examined. How 'bout trying to come up with more than one original thought a week..., my nine year old can do it - surely you can too.

As for your claim you care not who wins - poppycock - you want Harper back in.

As for your idea that we should have more debates (some in a one-on-one format) I'm all for it. But who do you think would oppose this idea? The opposition? No. Harper. it is Harper who would never consent to one-on-one debates. Moreover, he would never consent to more than ONE debate in each language. His platform is absent, his contempt is palpable, his arrogance is latent. Given the choice, he would prefer to remain mute until Oct. 14th.

Our current PM exudes an authoritarian ooze that belies his utter distaste for having to lower himself to answering serious questions. More debates indeed! Better chance Harper would actually deign to provide us with a platform, a 'vision' rather than his tired Bush I "stay the course" mantra.

Rex, get some new ideas. Or quit!

Gerson- Crack Addict & Ideological Whore

fr: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100203045.html

re: "The Leader Who Stood the Tallest"

Gerson,

Not only is your pickle limp, your mind is shot!
Swiss-cheese in the cranium!
Obviously, there's no cure yet for ideological syphilis.
How else does one explain your man-crush on Bush?

Perhaps, Crack? Are you smoking Crack?
When all is said and done you're gonna have to start taking the pills Krautcrazy is on. See his column today? At least he's trying to rehabilitate his mind! You on the other hand are beyond the pale. Surely it cannot be healthy to speak out the same orifice you wipe! Gerson, fix your affliction now; get thee to an arsehole doctor.

My God, "Bush's economic ideology... seems well suited to the current crisis"??? Are you crazy, his lax administrative tenure, morally bankrupt economic ideology, and his playing to the elites is what wrecked America's fiscal boat on the rocks! Did you also defend the Captain of the Exxon Valdez?

Indeed, what the "strobe light on a dark dance floor" that catches "all involved in characteristic, sometimes embarrassing poses" is revealing to me is that you are a petty apologist, on your knees, amid the disco, mouth open willing to service thy master no matter what the cost.

Gerson, you are clearly a closeted freak on Crack! Get some help you pathetic discourse distortionist. Get some help now. Before the music stops and you have lockjaw.

Winking Palin does Trick For Brooks

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/opinion/03brooks.html

re; "The Palin Rebound"

October 3rd, 2008 4:10 am
David,

Nice try, but your take is little more than vexatious pandering obviously aided by a dose of ideological Viagara.

Last night, my twelve year daughter, Quinn, sat with me throughout the last 45 minutes of the debate. Below is the transcript of our discussion. It speaks for itself:

Quinn: Dad, whatchwatching?

Me: American debate.

Quinn: Why, isn't the Canadian one on?

Me: Yeah, I'm taping it - I'll watch after you guys are in bed.

Quinn: But, Dad why do you watch the American one.

Me: Because it matters what they decide.

Quinn: Hey, is that lady ... Is that that Palin lady?

Me: Yes.

[Minutes pass, Ifill asks Palin another direct question.]

Quinn: Dad, is she s'pposed to answer the question asked?

Me: Well, in a debate, sometimes people try to avoid questions.

Quinn: Oh, ... but the other guy, the old one, he's answering the questions.

Me: Yeah, he's trying to show he's up to the job.

Quinn: But, her, Palin she just keeps talking about herself ... she's not answering the questions.

Me: No, she's not - that's their strategy.

Quinn: Yeah, but she keeps saying the same thing, 'Me and McCain' - she just keeps saying the same thing.

Me: Yeah, sometimes politics is like that.

Quinn: That's silly... hey, did you see that. She just winked at us? She just winked?

Me: [sigh] Yes, I'm trying to hear what she's saying...

Quinn: But dad she just WINKED at us!

Me: shhh...

Quinn: I don't know why your listening... she's just saying the same thing over and over... I can't believe she winked at us! Weird! I'm going to bed.

Me: G'night... [Quick hug and kiss]

And as Buddha is my witness, when I turn back to the screen Palin is winking at me again... "Weird" indeed?

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

NYT's "The Vice-Presidential Debate" - Send in the Clowns

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/10/03/opinion/03fri1.html

October 3rd, 2008 3:30 am
Time for McCain to 'Send in the Clowns'?

While it may be true that Palin's debate performance was not a debacle - it's nevertheless clear that talking points do not a Veep make. There was only one person on stage last night worthy of the challenge. And it was not the one in a skirt.

But fear not, McCain's not done yet. Alas, he is at this moment, conjuring a new strategy. Maybe one with a Broadway angle? Glass in hand, ruefully humming, occasionally slurring, he's probably echoing Sondheim:

Isn't it rich?
Aren't we a pair?
Me here at the end,
You nothing but flair.
Send in the clowns.

Isn't it bliss?
Don't you approve?
One who is desperate,
missing his grove.
One who is clueless,
her straight-talk a joke.
Set'em up Joe,
I need a toke.
Where are the clowns?
Send in the clowns.

Just when I'd thought I could win,
You turn out to be,
No better than spin.
Send in the clowns.

Making my entrance with my usual glare,
Sure of my lines,
But no one is there.
All eyes on you,
Empty words and fluff,
Good God what's happened - this is tough.
Don't you love farce?
It's a kick in the arse.

My fault I fear.
Thought you'd do okay.
Sorry, my dear, your no Hillary...
not today.

But where are the clowns?
Quick, send in the clowns.
Don't bother, they're here.

Isn't it rich?
Isn't it queer,
Losing my mind this late
In my career?

And where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns.
Well, maybe next year...

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

McCain - "Send in the Clowns"

fr: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100203043.html - "Hail mary vs. Cool Barry"

Time for McCain to 'Send in the Clowns'?

Dear Krautcrazy,

Again, reflecting on the new found reason you are exhibiting, again I say kudos on your rehab. May full recovery not be far behind.

In light of Palin's debate performance it's clear that talking points do not a Veep make. There was only one person on stage last night worthy of the challenge. And it was not the one in a skirt.

Hail Mary's for sure, take solace Krautcrazy, McCain's probably not done yet?
Alas, he is probably, at this moment, conjuring a new 4th quarter play. Probably it's something as bold as taking his show to Broadway, for undoubtedly, McCain is now with glass in hand, ruefully humming, occasionally slurring and then belting out a rip-off of Sondheim:


Isn't it rich?
Aren't we a pair?
Me here at the end,
You nothing but flair.
Send in the clowns.

Isn't it bliss?
Don't you approve?
One who is desperate,
missing his grove.
One who is clueless,
her straight-talk a joke.
Set'em up Joe,
I need a toke.
Where are the clowns?
Send in the clowns.

Just when I'd thought I could win,
You turn out to be,
No better than spin.
Send in the clowns.

Making my entrance with my usual glare,
Sure of my lines,
But no one is there.
All eyes on you,
Empty words and fluff,
Good God what's happened - this is tough.
Don't you love farce?
It's a kick in the arse.

My fault I fear.
Thought you'd do okay.
Sorry, my dear, your no Hillary...
not today.

But where are the clowns?
Quick, send in the clowns.
Don't bother, they're here.

Isn't it rich?
Isn't it queer,
Losing my mind this late
In my career?

And where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns.
Well, maybe next year...

Cohen's "Nixon, Bush, Palin" - time for a course correction.

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/opinion/02Cohen.html

October 02, 2008 7:03 am

The most redeeming thing about a democracy is that it periodically affords a country's citizens the opportunity to correct course.

One can only hope that American voters recognize November 4th for what it is - a watershed event in the country's history. Failure to change course now will break America.

The election is not about Palin, it is not about McCain, it is not, and cannot be about, Guns, God, and vacuous Patriotism - it must be about progress - a new path. Otherwise, 'Rome will burn' and there will not be enough water on either Wall or Main Street to put the blaze out.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

NYT's "Rescue the Rescue" - Regulation needed.

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01friedman.html

136.
October 01, 2008 8:47 am

Link
Mr. Friedman,

The empty group-think demonstrated by consumers these past two decades has contributed to a demonizing of the notions of thrift and savings, is only rivaled by the failure of Congress to act with reasoned purpose this past week. Neither group is blameless.

By buying into a myth hitherto the purview of the truly wealthy, conspicuous consumption, the middle class not only overextended itself - but limited its chances of consolidating and paying down household debt to shield itself in the eventuality of an economic downturn. Ergo, today's middle class finds itself vulnerable to the tightening of credit in the marketplace and, in a very real sense, in peril of fading away. That being said, it does mean that today's middle class is deserving of government protection. This protection need not be founded on socialist principles, but rather upon a strong regulatory framework that will protect it from creditors as it begins its long term reorientation towards a new ethos of prudent consumption. Yes, a 'liberal' framework is needed.

Those like George Will who cling to the notion that "regulation" is akin to socialism are misguided. If a bailout is to come, let it come with regulatory safeguards. Otherwise, today's problems will persist. If no constraints are placed upon predatory creditors and Wall Street's amoral speculators the country will simply be revisited by another debacle in the years to come. Unfettered profit-seeking must be bound by rules designed not just to protect the individual, but to defend the viability of the national economy as well. Indeed, there is probably no greater threat today to US homeland security than the danger of an abject economic collapse borne of lax governance in the face of predatory market speculation.

Anyone who argues, as George Will does, that accepting regulatory reform in the final package is akin to selling one's soul to partisan Democrats intent on desecrating the principles of the founding fathers is simply wrong. Apparently, they do not understand the organic nature of American political history. Simple fact is, and has always been, that periodic increases in the size of government are often required to see the nation through; a la Roosevelt's NRA. In time, the pendulum swings back; a la G.W. Bush's tax cuts.

Today America's motto should be: Government only if necessary, but not necessarily Big Government.

As George Will admitted in today's WaPo, no matter where one stands on the regulatory question, the public still needs "protection against obliteration of the financial system". But, even more importantly, it needs this protection to come with a government guarantee that the financial system will have imposed upon it a little "protection" from itself - no matter what bill is finally passed.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

George Will - Maybe He Needs Regulation?

fr: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/30/AR2008093002320.html

Georgie Boy,

Reading this column "was easy, but not necessarily" fruitful. At times, it was just nausea inducing.

Okay Georgie Boy, let us "talk sense about the cultural roots of the financial crisis". Firstly, and I say this grudgingly, you are actually correct on at least one count - the public is not blameless.

The empty group-think demonstrated by consumers these past two decades has contributed to a demonizing of the notions of thrift and savings. By buying into a myth hitherto the purview of the truly wealthy, conspicuous consumption, the middle class not only overextended itself - but limited its chances of consolidating and paying down household debt to shield itself in the eventuality of an economic downturn. Ergo, today's middle class finds itself vulnerable to the tightening of credit in the marketplace and, in a very real sense, in peril of fading away. That being said, it does not preclude the fact that today's middle class is deserving of government protection. This protection need not be founded on socialist principles, but rather upon a strong regulatory framework that will protect it from creditors as it begins its long term reorientation towards a new ethos of prudent consumption. Yes, Georgie, a 'liberal' framework is needed.

Apparently Georgie you cling to the notion that "regulation" is akin to socialism. Pity, one would think your prominent spectacles would allow you to see farther into the future. If a bailout is to come, let it come with regulatory safeguards. Otherwise, today's problems will persist. If no constraints are placed upon predatory creditors and Wall Street's amoral speculators the country will simply be revisited by another debacle in the years to come. Unfettered profit-seeking must be bound by rules designed not just to protect the individual, but to defend the viability of the national economy as well. Indeed, there is probably no greater threat today to US homeland security than the danger of an abject economic collapse borne of lax governance in the face of predatory market speculation. Anyone who argues, as you do, that accepting regulatory reform in the final package is akin to selling one's soul to partisan Democrats intent on desecrating the principles of the founding fathers is simply wrong. Apparently, you do not understand the organic nature of your own country. Periodic increases in the size of government are sometimes required to see it through; a la Roosevelt's NRA. In time, the pendulum swings back; a la G.W. Bush's tax cuts.

Georgie Boy, America's motto should be: Government only if necessary, but not necessarily Big Government.

As you said Georgie, the public still needs "protection against obliteration of the financial system". But, even more importantly, it needs this protection to come with a government guarantee that the financial system will have imposed upon it a little "protection" from itself - no matter what bill is finally passed.

FIN



p.s. Georgie, re: your intriguing 'cultural roots' paradigm introduced at the beginning of column, it had potential. But true to form you choose to use it as 'device' rather than tool. Yet again, you meandered, dragging us up and down, and all around pundit-dung valley without ever coming to your point. What was your point about the role of culture? Too bad... I must have missed it amid your sniping at Democrats. Again, pity, would have loved to see you flesh it out.

Oh, Maggie

fr: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080930.wcowent30/CommentStory/specialComment/home

Wake up Maggie I think we got something to say to you-

Its late September and we really should be less the fools ... You know you used to keep us amused but now we feel we're being used-

Oh Maggie we can't read you any more ... somebody should show you the door - You poisoned our hearts and that's what really hurts-

The morning sun when its in your face really shows your age-
Your sick pettiness is now all the rage... We used to laugh at all of your jokes my God you don't need to coax-

Oh, Maggie we just can't read you any more-

Your Cattiness cuts to the bone - you deserve to be all alone-
You've sucked our souls and that's a pain we can do without-

All we needed was a friend to lend a guiding hand ... But you turned into a Mother-hater, you wore us out-
All you did was wreck our guts...
And this morning kick us in the nuts

Oh Maggie we can't try anymore-

You lure us away from news with words that just give us the blues...
You pollute our minds and we couldn't hate you more if we tried-

Oh Maggie we wish we'd never seen your words-

You made a first-class fool out of us
But blind as fools there no point in us reading you any more -
Oh, Maggie give it up before - we're all upchucking at your door...

Maggie ...

we wish we'd never seen your face... without your drivel we'll get back to our happy place...

Oh Maggie,...


(Thanks Rod Stewart for the template.)

Total Depression Mr. Cohen? maybe, but let us hope it comes with lessons.

fr: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/29/AR2008092902660_Comments.html

Mr. Cohen,

If "[a]n economic crisis is like war. It's impossible to contain. It affects everything it touches." So sir, does greed.

While indeed it may be true that the 1930s gave rise to Hitler, it should be noted that Italy's Mussolini had been in power for years. Fascism and communism may have been 'emboldened' by the crisis - but so were trade unionists, desegregation's, and a whole host of social movements intent improving equality within the polity.

Here in Canada, as well as the UK, it gave rise to the eventual introduction of our Medicare systems, unemployment insurance, family allowances, etc.,

Point is, if the current crisis precipitates a fundamental restructuring of US society that sees a more equitable deal for the American worker - it may indeed have an upside.

Nobody wants a return to the 1930s, nobody wants to see a rise in right-wing ideology and divisive fascism, nobody wants uncontrolled crisis. But rampant capitalist speculation got us here. They ran amok for too long - time for them to have a reality check and oversight.

Let the bailout pass Thursday - but let the privileged Wall St. crowd remember that their compact with the 'vox populi' has forever been altered, that their vaunted place in American culture is no longer guaranteed ... lest, next time, they will be overthrown... for good.
9/30/2008 12:50:48 AM

Bailout Failure- blame the system.

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/30/opinion/30tue1.html

September 30th, 2008 0:14 am

re: "the imperfections in this bill are the result of a democratic process that can be rethought, revisited and reworked"?

Methinks this bailout bill need never have suffered defeat on the Congressional floor had America only abandoned its antiquated two-party system years ago.

What really needs to be 'rethought, revisited' and reworked' is the fundamentally flawed assumption that two morally bankrupt political party's are all that is needed to represent the interests of 300 million people in a modern and dynamic society. Two political voices - talk about a Hobson's Choice. Without a viable and progressive third option American politics (and its economy) is destined to remain an absurdity!

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

Brooks faults leadership - a little too late.

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html

September 30th, 2008 0:00 am
Mr. Brooks,

Toxic politics begets toxic and weak leadership. How could it be any other way? The failure is yours- you should have recognized the downside of the inherent inbreeding between America's politicians and capitalists years ago.

Where were you then?

Ah, that's right, you were championing the causes of many of those culprits who got us here. Well done.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

American Thinker- wrong on Kristol

fr: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/kristol_how_mccain_wins.html
Mr. Moran,

There is simply no other way to put this. What you are proffering here is nothing more than a fine example of the excretion of egregious partisanship.

Cripes, I'm not sure who is more misguided, you, Kristol or Chuck Krautcrazy over at the Washington Post. Either way, one thing's for sure - a mind taxed by desperation is a terrible thing to lose; and it is clear that Mr. Kristol's is irrevocably lost.

Regarding Kritsol's trite offering today, nary a finer textual example of psycho-social disconnect and denial has ever been penned. To be blunt sir, I believe he no longer possess of the skill set required to grasp reality - let alone its truths.

Instead of blaming McCain's advisers for counseling "ideological timidity", Kristol should have said what he really meant: he wants John McCain to re-ignite the culture wars. He wants the election to devolve into a divisive battle rife with false moral assumptions about the 'other'. In his world, this 'other' is 'liberalism' and by raising Rev. Wright again, he is seeking to reanimate a 'bogeyman', a distraction, that will provide people of your ilk with an opportunity to twist the legitimate foundations of liberalism into a empty vessel. A vessel into which you will pour all the evils of the world. What you are really counseling by backing Kristol is that McCain/Palin to do is follow Hitler's advice "To make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they [the voters] will believe it.” My God, what price free speech.

As for Kristol's assertion that Gov. Palin is "a talented politician and communicator" - there is no evidence yet that the woman can think on her feet. While it's clear she can read a teleprompter, this is hardly a substitute for the cogent critical thought necessary to run a country. Let alone a great country. The fact she has yet to demonstrate any ability to handle unscripted complex questions seems not to influence his assessment. Moreover, his ridiculous contention that she must be 'liberated' demeans both her and the voter. This is not a 'Free Willy' movie. Had either she (or GOP strategists) really believed she was an asset to the message she would have been unleashed upon the medium long ago. That has not is telling. Ironically, Mr. Moran, you and I see eye to eye on the fallacy Kristol tries to advance on this point- except, of course, that you see this as an opportunity for Gov. Palin to capitalize on her simple-minded brashness, whereas I will be looking for substance.

In conclusion, what Mr. Kristol offered today was a form of pundit-dung indicative of the worst kind of partisanship that is blinded by a reactionary ideology intent on fostering nothing less than the telling of lies. Yet, perhaps, here again Kristol is channeling Hitler, and unfortunately you also seem to concur with the observation: “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.” The endorsement of an 'ends justifying the means' mantra is a sad reflection of the accepted values in a civil society. But again, such is the price of free speech.

Both you and Kristol need to look in the mirror and realize your true enemy is not liberalism - it is your fear and hate of the 'other'. Ask yourself, honestly, are you a truth teller? Beware the answer sir, for as Kristol may already know, as may you - the rationalization and answers of one who has lost one's mind cannot be trusted.

p.s. fully aware there is every likelihood you will refrain from posting this. I nevertheless respect your right to free speech.

Posted by: BeerBellyBuddah | September 29, 2008 12:14 PM

Bill Kristol- Losing his mind defending McCain

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html#postComment

September 29th, 2008 2:55 am
Mr. Kristol,

Cripes, I'm not sure who is more misguided, you or Krautcrazy over at the Washington Post. Either way, one thing's for sure - a mind taxed by desperation is a terrible thing to lose; and it is clear yours is irrevocably lost.

Regarding your trite offering today, nary a finer textual example of psycho-social disconnect and denial has ever been written. To be blunt sir, I believe you are no longer possess of the skill set required to grasp reality - let alone its truths.

Your blaming of Sen. McCain's advisers for counseling "ideological timidity" is both laughable and disingenuous. You should have said what you really meant: you want John McCain to re-ignite the culture wars. You want the election to devolve into a divisive battle rife with false moral assumptions about the 'other'. In your world, this 'other' is 'liberalism' and byy raising Rev. Wright again, you are seeking to reanimate a 'bogeyman', a distraction, that will provide people of your ilk with an opportunity to twist the legitimate foundations of liberalism into a empty vessel. A vessel which both you and McCain can pour all the evils of the world. What you are really counseling McCain/Palin to do is follow Hitler's advice "To make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they [the voters] will believe it.” In your sad defense, perhaps this is only way the GOP ticket can win? But, my God, what a cost.

As for your assertion that Gov. Palin is "a talented politician and communicator" - there is no evidence yet that the woman can think on her feet. While it's clear she can read a teleprompter, this is hardly a substitute for the cogent critical thought necessary to run a country. Let alone a great country. The fact she has yet to demonstrate any ability to handle unscripted complex questions seems not to influence your characterization. Moreover, your ridiculous contention that she must be 'liberated' demeans both her and the voter. This is not a 'Free Willy' movie. Had either she (or GOP strategists) really believed she was an asset to the message she would have been unleashed upon the medium long ago. The fact she has not is telling.

In conclusion, Mr. Kristol, your pundit-dung is the indicative of the worst kind of partisanship - blinded by a reactionary ideology you are intent on fostering nothing less than the telling of lies. Yet, perhaps, here again you are channeling Hitler, for undoubtedly you seem to concur with his observation: “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”

Look in the mirror Mr. Kristol, your true enemy is not liberalism - it is your cultural hate. Ask yourself, honestly, are you a truth teller? Beware the answer sir, for as you may already know - one who has lost one's mind cannot be trusted.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

Income Gap and the Bailout

fr: http://www.nytimes.com/gst/emailus.html

Mr. Johnston,

Sorry to bother you.

Quick question re: your article "Income Gap Is Widening, Data Shows" (Mar. 29, 2007).

The facts presented in the article on the 'gap' were very revealing. I know the original data was based on 2005 figures - any chance you could revisit the issue now by updating the 'gap' as it applies to the wealthiest stockholders (as a percentage of total population)?

I guess my question is, based on 2006-2007 date would it be possible to ascertain if the new bailout (as presently configured) will preserve the existing income gap? Or, will it see a narrowing in income disparity?

As one who views the 'income gap' as a fundamental threat to overall economic stability of the continent, I would be interested on your interpretation as to whether the bailout will have any effect on the perpetuation of the status-quo.

Understand fully if you consider this an absurd request, but I do think it would be a useful and enlightening exercise for the average reader.

Thank-you for your patience,

Sincerely,

John McCain: His ambition corrupts absolutely.

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/28/opinion/28rich.html?s=2

September 28, 2008 4:17 am
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men." (Lord Acton - 1887)

In light of McCain's self-centered actions surrounding the bailout last week it's time Lord Acton's dictum was updated.

In McCain's case, perhaps it should read "Power tends to corrupt; the appetite for power corrupts one's honor absolutely. Ambition is no substitute for greatness."

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

Brooks Goes to Far

from: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/26/opinion/26brooks.html

September 26th, 2008 3:27 am
Mr. Brooks,

"If McCain is elected"[?] - Surely you jest!

Your punditry suffers when old habits (and allegiances) die hard. Your saying McCain lacks the depth of "a sophisticated conceptual thinker" but is, nevertheless, "a good judge of character" rings false. The candidate's recent actions actually lead one to believe he no longer has any concept of what constitutes 'good character'. Neither in a Veep, nor in himself.

Blaming the campaign silly season for not allowing us to see that McCain is "above all ... a serious man prone to serious things" will not wash. For this is precisely the season, more than any other, when a candidate's true character must shine through. There are no 'do-overs'. And on this account, John Sidney McCain has failed miserably. To pretend otherwise, or aver we are not now seeing the 'real McCain' is beneath you.

Mr. Brooks, if it is true that "old soldiers never die - they just fade away"; better sir for all concerned with preserving their dignity, to abandon old allegiances, and allow this particular old soldier, this GOP candidate, to mercifully fade away.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

NYT Palin exceptionalism

fr: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/25/opinion/25Cohen.html

September 25, 2008 6:25 am

Link

Palin's Republican Neo-Exceptionalism in incapable of looking critically at how America's efforts to project unilateral power under Bush is viewed by the rest of the world: as willful arrogance or, at best, as blind ignorance. As such, anybody like Palin who clings to her guns & religion world view it is fated neither to succeed nor alleviate global tensions.

In the end, a Palin presidency would bring nothing but the second fall of Rome to American soil.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada Recommended by 322 Readers

NYT version of Will critique

from: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/09/24/opinion/24wed1.html?s=2&pg=3

September 24th, 2008 10:48 am
"Experience demands that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the general prey of the rich on the poor." - Thomas Jefferson

Today in the Washington Post George Will observed "The essence of this crisis is lack of knowledge, including the inability to know who owes what to whom, and where risk resides." Of course this is the same pundit who once observed: "The future has a way of arriving unannounced." Well, the future is here. The American economy is in tatters. Congressional oversight, always a dream, is soon to be a nightmare. And the 'free market' is but a corrupt joke.

The brand of political and economic freedom prized so dearly by the likes of G. Will and W. Kristol has failed. Its potential sold short. Sold on the cheap. Sold on the backs of the American public.

George Will once opined: "Americans are overreaching; overreaching is the most admirable and most American of the many American excesses." Now with capitalist excess rotting the foundation of the once "shining house on a hill" its time he recanted.

The incestuous relationship long championed by the right wing mouth pieces turns out to have been built on nothing but a sick symbiotic relationship between the goals of power and greed. The perverse troika of amoral politician, complicit regulator, and abetting banker has borne America a bazturd child. One that threatens all the pillars of American Democracy.

I wonder if in Rome's waning days its recalcitrant pundits were trying to rationalize the irrational?

Empire, always fleeting, is never defeated from without - it is always from within. And in this case one need look no further than the Conservative mirror to see the culprit. Reaganomics, thy name is mud. The only trickle down you ever bring is abuse of power.

Wishing the likes of Kristol and Will no ill-will, I pray they fare better than Shakespeare's 'Cinna, the Poet' from "Julius Caesar", who you may recall "a mob, eager for blood" kills using the "excuse that they never liked his poems much anyway". Such is the fate of facile mouthpieces. Beware the mob Kristol and Will! Brooks, you be careful too.

— BeerBellyBuddah, Wpg., Canada

Jane Taber- Useless orifice!

fr: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080923.WBTaber20080923183450/WBStory/WBTaber/#commentLatest

You (BeerBelly Buddah, from Wpg, Canada) wrote: Okay.

Fair enough automated moderators. I am redacting my term "talking" that was paired with the word that began with T-W-A (and ended in T) and replacing it with "orating orifice". Will this do?

Jane,

Whatsamatta? Couldn't you get us more insight into his film critiques than just one movie?

What about "Deep Throat"? Wouldn't he have an apt critical take on a orating orifice?

What about "Bambi"? Wouldn't he belie a dislike for usury hunters?

What about "Network"? No insight into his views on the empty messy media maven - devoid of substance - who will sell her soul at any cost? Can't you tell us what Dion thinks of this movie?

C'mon, Enquiring Minds Wanna Know!

You useless mammary! * Posted 24/09/08 at 2:43 AM EDT


You (BeerBelly Buddah, from Wpg, Canada) wrote: It's one thing to critique a candidates platform - entirely another to spin gobs of garbage.

Does anyone aside from me want to start a petition to CTV to get this vapid vacuous quasi-intellect fired? * Posted 24/09/08 at 2:51 AM EDT

re: George Will's WaPo Article 09/24/08

fr: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/23/AR2008092302325_Comments.html

"Experience demands that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the general prey of the rich on the poor." - Thomas Jefferson



Georgie Boy,

You once said: "The future has a way of arriving unannounced."

Well, the future is here. The American economy is in tatters. Congressional oversight, once a dream, is soon to be a nightmare. And the 'free market' is but a corrupt joke.

The brand of political and economic freedom you prize so dearly has failed. Its potential sold short. Sold on the cheap. Sold on the backs of the American public.

You once wrote: "Americans are overreaching; overreaching is the most admirable and most American of the many American excesses." Now with capitalist excess rotting the foundation of the once "shining house on a hill" I beseech you to recant.

The incestuous relationship you have long championed was built on nothing but a sick symbiotic relationship between the ideals of power and greed. The perverse troika of amoral politician, complicit regulator, and abetting banker has borne America a bazturd child. One that threatens all the pillars of American Democracy.

I wonder if Rome's recalcitrant pundits in its waning days also tried, like you, to rationalize the irrational?

Empire, always fleeting, is never defeated from without - it is always from within. And in your case one need look no further than the Conservative mirror to see the culprit. Reaganomics, thy name is mud. The only trickle down you ever bring is abuse of power.

Georgie, wishing no ill-will, I pray you fare better than Shakespeare's 'Cinna, the Poet' from "Julius Caesar". You may recall "a mob, eager for blood" kills him using the "excuse that they never liked his poems much anyway". Such is the fate of the facile poet- beware the mob Georgie Boy!

9/24/2008 1:27:51 AM